Question

Let me break this down:
1. First, I need to list Tokyo's 23 special wards
2. Then find deceased animation art directors whose names match one of those ward names
3. The match could be in Japanese (where the ward name is also a common surname) or Chinese

Let me start by searching for both lists simultaneously.

I now have the list of Tokyo's 23 special wards. Let me compile them:

1. 千代田区 (Chiyoda)
2. 中央区 (Chuo)
3. 港区 (Minato)
4. 新宿区 (Shinjuku)
5. 文京区 (Bunkyo)
6. 台東区 (Taito)
7. 墨田区 (Sumida)
8. 江東区 (Koto)
9. 品川区 (Shinagawa)
10. 目黒区 (Meguro)
11. 大田区 (Ota)
12. 世田谷区 (Setagaya)
13. 渋谷区 (Shibuya)
14. 中野区 (Nakano)
15. 杉並区 (Suginami)
16. 豊島区 (Toshima)
17. 北区 (Kita)
18. 板橋区 (Itabashi)
19. 練馬区 (Nerima)
20. 足立区 (Adachi)
21. 荒川区 (Arakawa)
22. 葛飾区 (Katsushika)
23. 江戸川区 (Edogawa)

Now I need to find which of these ward names also matches a deceased animation art director. The key insight is that in Japanese, many place names can also be surnames. Let me think about this:

- "中野" (Nakano) - could be a surname
- "板橋" (Itabashi) - could be a surname
- "足立" (Adachi) - very common surname
- "荒川" (Arakawa) - could be a surname
- "品川" (Shinagawa) - could be a surname
- "江東" (Koto) - less likely as surname
- "墨田" (Sumida) - less likely as surname

Wait, let me reconsider. The question asks about an animation art d

Let me search more specifically for deceased anime art directors whose names match Tokyo ward names. I should try several ward names as surnames in Japanese animation context. Let me also try the Chinese term "动画美术导演" with specific ward names.

Key ward names to try: 
- 足立 (Adachi) - very common surname
- 中野 (Nakano) - possible
- 品川 (Shinagawa) - less common
- 江東 (Koto) - less common
- 江戸川 (Edogawa) - rare
- 荒川 (Arakawa) - less common
- 葛飾 (Katsushika) - very unusual
- 江戸川 (Edogawa) - very rare
- 汐 (Ko) or other

Wait, I need to think about this differently. The question is in Chinese, and the user mentions "animation art director" (动画美术导演). This could be a Chinese animation art director, not just Japanese. Let me also consider Chinese ward names or transliterations.

Actually, looking at the Chinese names of the wards:
- 千代田 (Qiándàitián)
- 中央 (Zhōngyāng)
- 港 (Gǎng)
- 新宿 (Xīnxiù)
- 文京 (Wénjīng)
- 台東 (Tái Dōng)
- 墨田 (Mò tián)
- 江東 (Jiāngdōng)
- 品川 (Pǐnchuān)
- 目黒 (Mùhēi)
- 大田 (Dàtián)

I haven't found a direct match yet. Let me think about this differently. The question says "animation art director" (动画美术导演). In Chinese, this could refer to someone working in Chinese animation or Japanese animation. Let me try searching with different ward names as surnames.

Let me try some more specific searches. The ward names that are common Japanese surnames include:
- 中野 (Nakano)
- 板橋 (Itabashi)
- 足立 (Adachi)
- 北 (Kita/Beki)

Wait - actually let me reconsider the approach. Maybe I should search for deceased anime/art directors specifically named after wards. Let me try some less obvious ones too.

Actually, let me think about this from the Chinese perspective. The user used "动画美术导演" which is the Chinese term. Let me search in Chinese for animation art directors who share names with Tokyo wards.

Also, I should consider that the name might be in kanji and could match if we look at the characters. For example:
- 大田 (Ōta) - also a surname
- 江東 (Kōtō) - less common
- 荒川 (Arakawa) -

I'm not finding a direct match yet. Let me think about this more carefully. The question mentions "animation art director" (动画美术导演). In Japanese, this would be 美術監督 (bijutsu kantoku). 

Let me try to search with different ward names that could also be surnames in Japanese:
- 千代田 (Chiyoda) - rare as surname
- 中央 (Chuo) - possible
- 港 (Minato/Mine) - possible
- 新宿 (Shinjuku) - not a surname
- 文京 (Bunkyo) - not a common surname
- 墨田 (Sumida) - could be a surname
- 目黒 (Meguro) - could be a surname
- 渋谷 (Shibuya) - could be a surname
- 杉並 (Suginami) - not a surname
- 豊島 (Toshima) - not a common surname
- 足立 (Adachi) - very common surname
- 葛飾 (Katsushika) - very unusual
- 江戸川 (Edogawa) - very unusual

Wait, I should also consider the Chinese names. The user is writing in Chinese, so maybe the match is in Chinese? But the context is about Tokyo special wards and animation art directors.

Let me try a completely different approach. Let me search for famous deceased anime art directors and see

Let me try a different approach. Let me look at the Wikipedia category for anime art directors and see if any of their names match Tokyo ward names.

Also, let me think about this more carefully. The question says "animation art director" (动画美术导演). In Chinese animation context, this could also mean someone from Chinese animation. But the user is clearly talking about Japan's 23 special wards, so the animation person is likely Japanese.

Let me look at the full list of anime art directors on Wikipedia to find potential matches.

Looking through this list of anime art directors, let me check if any names match Tokyo ward names:

- 渋谷幸弘 - 渋谷 (Shibuya)! 渋谷 is both a surname and one of Tokyo's 23 special wards!

Let me verify if 渋谷幸弘 (Shibuya Yukihiro) is deceased. Let me search for more information about him.

I found it. 渋谷幸弘 (Shibuya Yukihiro) was a deceased anime art director whose surname is 渋谷 (Shibuya), which is also one of Tokyo's 23 special wards - 渋谷区 (Shibuya-ku).

Key facts:
- Name: 渋谷幸弘 (しぶたに ゆきひろ)
- Occupation: Anime art director / 美術監督
- Died: September 15, 2024
- Age: 63
- Known for: Art direction on "Natsume's Book of Friends" (夏目友人帳), Detective Conan (名探偵コナン), Lupin III (ルパン三世), and many other anime

The ward name is 渋谷区 (Shibuya-ku), one of Tokyo's 23 special wards.

Let me verify by visiting his Wikipedia page to confirm details.

I've confirmed the answer. 渋谷幸弘 (Shibuya Yukihiro) was a Japanese animation art director (アニメーション美術監督) who died on September 15, 2024. His surname 渋谷 (Shibuya) is also the name of one of Tokyo's 23 special wards - 渋谷区 (Shibuya-ku).

Let me now compile my final report.

Let me research station-city integrated development projects associated with the 2020 Tokyo Olympics. I'll search for this in both Chinese and English to find the specific project mentioned.

I found some interesting leads. Let me look more into the Shinagawa Station redevelopment and other station-city integrated projects related to the 2020 Tokyo Olympics. I also need to think about the clue about a "deceased animation art director" whose name matches a Tokyo ward.

Let me search for more specific information about:
1. The Shinagawa Development Project (品川駅開発事業) - this seems like a major station-city integrated development
2. Other Olympic-related station developments
3. The animation art director clue - which Tokyo ward shares a name with a deceased animation art director?

Tokyo wards include: Chiyoda, Chuo, Minato, Shinjuku, Bunkyo, Taito, Sumida, Koto, Shinagawa, Meguro, Ota, Setagaya, Shibuya, Nakano, Suginami, Toshima, Kita, Arakawa, Itabashi, Nerima, Adachi, Katsushika, Edogawa

For the animation art director clue, let me think... "Nerima" is known as an anime district but isn't named after an art director. Wait - could it be referring to someone whose surname matc

The search about the animation art director didn't directly give me a match with a Tokyo ward name. Let me think more carefully.

The clue says: "a specific Tokyo ward that shares a name with a deceased animation art director." This could mean the ward's name is the same as an art director's surname or full name.

Let me think about Tokyo wards: Chiyoda, Chuo, Minato, Shinjuku, Bunkyo, Taito, Sumida, Koto, Shinagawa, Meguro, Ota, Setagaya, Shibuya, Nakano, Suginami, Toshima, Kita, Arakawa, Itabashi, Nerima, Adachi, Katsushika, Edogawa

Wait - I just found that Kazuo Ebisawa (海崎孝雄?) died recently. His surname Ebisawa doesn't match any ward.

Let me think differently. Could there be an animation art director named 品川 (Shinagawa)? Or maybe the project is in a different area.

Actually, let me reconsider. The question says the project is in a Tokyo ward that "shares a name" with a deceased animation art director. This could be a first name or last name match.

What about 阿达 (Adachi)? No...

I'm not finding a direct match between a Tokyo ward name and an animation art director. Let me think about this differently.

The question says "a specific Tokyo ward that shares a name with a deceased animation art director." Let me consider:
- Could it be 杉並 (Suginami)? Is there an art director named Suginami? Unlikely.
- What about 大田区 (Ota)? 
- 江東区 (Koto)?
- 練馬区 (Nerima)?

Wait - let me reconsider. Maybe I should search for famous deceased anime art directors and see if any of their names match a Tokyo ward.

Let me also think about the Shinagawa station development more carefully. The Shinagawa Development Project was indeed promoted by the 2020 Olympics preparation, as the new Takanawa Gateway Station was built for the Olympics (the Yamanote Line loop was completed in March 2020 for the Games).

But wait - let me look at this from another angle. Let me search for "品川" as a name in animation, or other ward names.

Actually, I just had a thought. What if the answer is related to 高輪

Now I'm getting clearer information. The Shinagawa Station Development Project (品川駅開発事業) and specifically the Takanawa Gateway City development was directly promoted by the 2020 Tokyo Olympics. The new Takanawa Gateway Station was built for the Olympics.

However, I still need to figure out the animation art director clue. The project is in Shinagawa Ward (港区). Is there a deceased animation art director whose name is "Shinagawa" (品川)?

Let me also reconsider whether the project might be in a different ward. Let me look at this from the other direction - search for deceased animation art directors whose names match Tokyo wards.

Actually, wait. Let me re-read the question: "this project is in a specific Tokyo ward that shares a name with a deceased animation art director." 

Could this mean the animation art director's surname is the same as a ward? For instance, is there an art director named "Shinagawa" (品川)? Or could it be a first name?

Let me also think about this: Could the projec

I'm still not finding the animation art director clue. Let me think about this differently.

The question mentions "a deceased animation art director." Kazuo Ebisawa died recently (April 2026), but his surname doesn't match any Tokyo ward. 

Let me reconsider the whole problem. Maybe I should search for specific anime art directors whose names match Tokyo wards. Let me try different ward names as potential surnames:

- 大田 (Ōta) - this IS a surname!
- 足立 (Adachi) - this IS a surname!
- 練馬 (Nerima) - not a surname
- 北 (Kita) - could be part of a name
- 荒川 (Arakawa) - could be a surname

Wait, let me think about 渋谷 (Shibuya)... Shibuya is primarily known as an area, but it's also technically Shibuya Ward...

Hmm, what about 小笠原... no, that's not a ward.

Actually wait - let me reconsider. The Shinagawa Station Development spans across both Shinagawa Ward (品川区) and Minato Ward (港区). Takanawa, where the new station is, is in Minato Ward. The main Shinagawa Station is in Shinagawa Ward.

Wha

I still haven't found a clear match between a Tokyo ward name and a deceased animation art director. Let me think about this problem differently.

Let me reconsider the clue: "a specific Tokyo ward that shares a name with a deceased animation art director." 

Maybe I should search for famous anime/manga artists who share names with Tokyo wards. What if it's not strictly an "art director" but could be broader?

Wait - what about 大田 (Ōta)? There's Ota Ward in Tokyo. Is there a famous animation person named Ota? 

Or what about 足立 (Adachi)? There's Adachi Ward. Is there an animation person named Adachi?

Actually, let me think about this from the Chinese perspective since the question is partially in Chinese. In Chinese:
- Shinagawa = 品川
- Ota = 大田
- Chiyoda = 千代田
- Bunkyo = 文京
- Taito = 台东
- Koto = 江东
- Setagaya = 世田谷
- Nerima = 練马
- Suginami = 杉并

Hmm, none of these immediately ring a bell as animation art directors.

Wait - what about 目黒 (Meguro)? 目黑区... No...

Let me try yet another a

I'm still not finding a direct match. Let me try a completely different approach. Let me think about this from the Chinese language perspective, since the question is partly in Chinese. The user is searching in Chinese and may be using terminology that's more specific to the Chinese context.

In Chinese, "站城一体化" (station-city integration) is a very specific term used in Chinese urban planning. The user is asking me to find a project in Tokyo that matches this concept.

Let me reconsider the whole problem. Maybe I should search for the specific connection between the Olympics and station-city development in Chinese sources. Also, let me think about which animation art director could share a name with a Tokyo ward.

Wait - what if the answer is about **品川区 (Shinagawa Ward)** and the animation art director is someone whose name is 品川? Or what if it's about a different ward?

Actually, let me reconsider. What if the deceased animation art director is **美術監督** (art director) and their name 

I found a very important clue! The first Chinese-language search result confirms:

"东京品川车辆段站城一体化改造开发" - This is the Shinagawa Vehicle Depot Station-City Integrated Development Project.

And from the PDF link: "'高轮Gateway'站一体化开发'品川开发项目'以'CITY UP！'为口号，目标是实现具有吸引力的现代站城一体化发展。"

So the project is clearly the **品川开发项目 (Shinagawa Development Project)**, specifically the Takanawa Gateway station-city integrated development.

Now I still need to solve the puzzle about which Tokyo ward shares a name with a deceased animation art director.

Let me reconsider. The Shinagawa Station Development spans multiple wards but primarily involves:
1. 品川区 (Shinagawa Ward) - where Shinagawa Station itself is located
2. 港区 (Minato Ward) - where Takanawa/Takanawa Gateway Station is located

Wait... Could there be an animation art director named 港区 or 港 (Minato)?

Actually, let me reconsider completely. Maybe I'm wrong about which ward it's in. Let me check whether there might be another Olympic-related TOD proje

Interesting! I found something in result #1 from the second search:

"奥井伸先生 （墨田区立桜堤中学校）元アニメ美術監督"

This mentions someone named 奥井伸 (Shin Okui) who was a former anime art director, but it's just incidental - mentioning his affiliation with a school in Sumida Ward. The name doesn't match a ward.

But wait, I also see in the first result: "（大田区立馬込東中学校）元キャラクタープランナー" and "（墨田区立桜堤中学校）元アニメ美術監督" - these are just affiliations of people with schools in those wards, not their personal names.

Let me try a completely different approach. Let me think about this from the Chinese language perspective. The user is writing in Chinese and using the term "站城一体化." In Chinese media, when they talk about the Shinagawa development, they call it "品川开发项目" or "品川站城一体化."

So the project is almost certainly the **品川开发项目 (Shinagawa Development Project)**. This is the most prominent station-city integrated development project in Tokyo that was directly promoted by the 2020 Olympics.

Now, the question is: which Toky

The page about the Shinagawa project is very helpful, but it doesn't explicitly mention the 2020 Olympics. However, from my earlier search results, I know that the Shinagawa Station Development was directly promoted by the Olympics. The Takanawa Gateway Station was built for the Olympics, and the entire development was accelerated.

Now I need to figure out the animation art director puzzle. Let me try a different approach. Let me think about this more carefully.

The question says: "this project is in a specific Tokyo ward that shares a name with a deceased animation art director"

What if the key is in the word "deceased" (已故/过世)? This is a riddle, and the "deceased" part is important. It's not just "a name" - it's a "deceased" person. This could be a very well-known person.

Let me think of famous animation art directors who have passed away:
1. Kazuo Ebisawa (海崎孝雄) - died April 2026 - surname doesn't match a ward
2. Other famous ones?

Wait, what about someone like **品川** (Shinagaw

I found a very important result! In the first search, result #2:

"アニメ監督の鴫野彰（しぎの・あきら）さんが5月30日午後2時4分、胆管がんのため東京都品川区の病院で死去した。70歳。北海道出身。"

This says: "Anime director Siginno Akira passed away on May 30 at a hospital in Shinagawa Ward, Tokyo. He was 70 years old."

But this is about an anime director (not art director) who died in Shinagawa Ward, not someone whose name is Shinagawa.

And more importantly, I found result #9:
"アニメ美術監督・渋谷幸弘さん死去 63歳 「ルパン三世」「名探偵コナン」"

This says: "Anime art director ShIBUTANI Yukihiro passed away at 63. 'Lupin III', 'Detective Conan'..."

Wait - 渋谷幸弘 (Shibutani Yukihiro)... His surname is 渋谷 (Shibuya)! And he was an ANIME ART DIRECTOR! He just passed away in 2024!

**渋谷 (Shibuya)** is a Tokyo ward! The name of the art director (Shibutani) is the same as the name of a Tokyo ward (Shibuya/渋谷).

But wait, the project I found (the Shinagawa development) is in **品川区 (Shinagawa Ward)**, not 渋谷区 (Shibuya Ward). So there's a mismatch.

Unless... the question is pointing 

Now I have confirmed that **渋谷幸弘 (Shibutani Yukihiro)** was a famous anime art director who died on September 15, 2024. His surname 渋谷 (Shibuya) is the same as **渋谷区 (Shibuya Ward)** in Tokyo.

But the key question is: is there a station-city integrated development project in Shibuya Ward that was directly promoted by the 2020 Olympics? The evidence I've found so far points to the **品川开发项目 (Shinagawa Development Project)**, not a project in Shibuya.

Let me reconsider. The user's question says "this project is in a specific Tokyo ward that shares a name with a deceased animation art director." 

What if I'm wrong about which project it is? What if there's a station-city development in Shibuya related to the Olympics?

Actually, wait. Let me re-read the user's question one more time:

"I need to find a station-city integrated development project (站城一体化开发项目) in Tokyo that was directly promoted by the preparation for this global sporting event."

"Also consider that this project is in a s

Interesting! Now I'm finding strong connections between Shibuya's redevelopment and the 2020 Olympics. Let me look at some of these results more carefully:

1. From result #3 in the first search: "2020年の東京オリンピック開催に向けて、東京23区では急ピッチに再開発が進んでいます。中でも最も注目すべきエリアが渋谷駅周辺の大規模再開発です。" (Toward the 2020 Tokyo Olympics, large-scale redevelopment is advancing rapidly across Tokyo's 23 wards. Of these, the most notable area is the large-scale redevelopment around Shibuya Station.)

2. From result #5: "「渋谷の街」の発展の節目に欠かせない 「東京オリンピック...」" - The development of Shibuya was linked to the Olympics.

3. From result #6: "渋谷駅では4街区6棟の高層ビルが五輪までの完成を目指す" (At Shibuya Station, 4 blocks and 6 high-rise buildings are being built to be completed by the Olympics).

4. From the second search, result #5: "The intermediate goal of the redevelopment project timeframe is the 2020 Tokyo Olympic and Paralympic Games, with everything scheduled for final completion in..." (from niponica)

5. From the second search, result #6: "Tokyo 

I still haven't found an animation art director specifically named 品川 (Shinagawa). Let me reconsider my approach.

Actually, I want to revisit something. The user's question mentions "a deceased animation art director." In Chinese, this might be 动画美术指导 or 美术监督 or 艺术总监 or even 角色设计师 etc.

Wait - I just realized something. Let me reconsider whether the Shinagawa Ward and 渋谷幸弘 connection works differently. What if:

The answer IS the Shinagawa Development Project (品川开发项目), located in Shinagawa Ward (品川区).

But maybe there IS an anime-related person named Shinagawa who has died that I simply haven't found yet through my searches.

Or alternatively, maybe I should accept that:
1. The project is clearly the Shinagawa Development Project (品川开发项目)
2. It's located in Shinagawa Ward (品川区)
3. The animation art director clue might point to a different aspect

Let me try one more search for an animation/manga figure named Shinagawa who has passed away.

Actually, wait. Let me reconsider the whole p

Now I have confirmed that the Shibuya Station redevelopment was indeed promoted by the 2020 Olympics. But the Chinese-language sources specifically highlight the Shinagawa Development Project as the exemplar of "站城一体化."

However, looking at both projects:

1. **品川开发项目 (Shinagawa Development Project)**:
   - Clearly labeled as "站城一体化" in Chinese sources
   - Takanawa Gateway Station opened March 2020 for the Olympics
   - Located in 品川区 (Shinagawa Ward) and 港区 (Minato Ward)
   - Strong Olympic connection

2. **渋谷駅周辺再開発 (Shibuya Station Area Redevelopment)**:
   - Also promoted by the Olympics
   - Also a major station-city development
   - Located in 渋谷区 (Shibuya Ward)
   - The animation art director 渋谷幸弘 (Shibutani Yukihiro) died in 2024, and his surname matches the ward name

The key question is: which one is the answer the user is looking for?

Given the specific mention of "站城一体化" (station-city integration) in the question, and the fact that this term is more commonly used in Chines

I couldn't find an animation art director specifically named 品川 (Shinagawa). Let me reconsider my approach entirely.

Actually, wait. Let me reconsider the possibility that I've been approaching this puzzle incorrectly. What if:

1. The project IS the Shinagawa Development Project (品川开发项目)
2. It IS located in Shinagawa Ward (品川区)
3. But the "deceased animation art director" clue is meant to help identify the ward through a different mechanism

What if "shares a name" means something like "the ward's name appears in the art director's name" rather than "the art director's surname is the same as the ward name"?

For example, if there's an art director whose name contains 品 or 川?

Or what if I should look at this from the Chinese perspective? In Chinese, 品川 would be written as 品川. Is there an animation art director whose Chinese name includes 品川?

Hmm, this is getting too speculative. Let me try one more approach.

Actually, let me reconsider whether the answer might be about the **渋谷駅周辺再

Let me synthesize what I've found so far.

The task asks me to find a station-city integrated development project (站城一体化开发项目) in Tokyo that was directly promoted by the preparation for the 2020 Tokyo Olympics, and which is located in a Tokyo ward that shares a name with a deceased animation art director.

Key findings:

1. **Shinagawa Station Development Project (品川駅開発プロジェクト)**: This is a major TOD/station-city integrated development project led by JR East. It includes the construction of Takanawa Gateway Station (高輪ゲートウェイ駅), which opened in March 2020 just before the Olympics. The project involves four blocks around Shinagawa Station, with a "multi-chip" design concept. Multiple sources confirm this was accelerated by the 2020 Olympics - the new station was built specifically for the Olympic year, and the overall redevelopment aimed to create an international exchange hub for the Games.

2. **Shibuya Station Redevelopment**: Also significantly promoted by the 2020 Olympics, with compl

Let me research this step by step. I need to find a Tokyo-based talent agency famous for training beautiful/high-profile female news anchors, whose headquarters is located near a major station-city integrated development project related to the 2020 Tokyo Olympics.

Let me start by searching for Japanese talent agencies known for female news anchors and their connections to Olympic-related developments.

I found important clues. Let me analyze:

1. From the search results, I can see that **cent. FORCE** (セント・フォース) is a Japanese talent agency located in **Shibuya-ku, Ebisu** (東京都渋谷区恵比寿), founded in 1994, specializing in training announcers/news anchors and entertainers. It's known for being the "announcer's cradle" (announcer no tategoya/登竜門).

2. The key question is: is cent. FORCE's headquarters near a major station-city development project related to the 2020 Tokyo Olympics?

Ebisu is in Shibuya-ku, and the Higashi-Ginza area (one of the biggest station developments) is not there. But let me think about what Olympic-related station developments are near Ebisu.

Wait - actually, I need to think more carefully. The Toranomon Hills Station Tower project was inspired by the Olympics - it was supposed to be completed by 2020. And Roppongi Hills is also in that area. But those are in Minato-ku, not Shibuya-ku.

Let me reconsider. The user mentioned "a major station-city integrated developm

Now I have confirmed:
1. **cent. FORCE** (セント・フォース) is headquartered in **Ebisu, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo** (東京都渋谷区恵比寿4-1-22 ネオナートアネックス5F)
2. It was founded in 1994 and specializes in training announcers (news anchors) and entertainers
3. It's known for being a "cradle" of female news anchors

Now I need to find the connection to a "major station-city integrated development project related to the 2020 Tokyo Olympics" that is in the same area.

Ebisu is in Shibuya-ku. What Olympic-related station development is near Ebisu?

Wait - let me reconsider. The question says "the same area as a major station-city integrated development project related to the 2020 Tokyo Olympics." 

Let me think about what's near Ebisu:
- Ebisu itself has no major station development
- But wait, there's the **Shibuya** area which had major developments (Shibuya Stream, Shibuya Scramble Square) but those aren't specifically Olympics-related

Hmm, but actually, let me reconsider. Maybe the answer isn't cent. FORCE. Let m

I found an important clue. From the search results, I can see that:

1. **cent. FORCE** (セント・フォース) is headquartered in Ebisu, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo.
2. It's known for training female news anchors and announcers.
3. There's a mention of **渋谷駅周辺まちづくりビジョン** (Shibuya Station Area Development Vision) that was created in the context of the 2020 Tokyo Olympics. The document says: "東京オリンピックを契機にインフラ整備が加速..." (Infrasructure development accelerated as a basis for the Tokyo Olympics)

But wait, the user is asking about a "station-city integrated development project" (駅・まち) that is in the "same area" as the agency. The Shibuya development (Shibuya Scramble Square, Shibuya Stream) is a major development, but I'm not sure if it's specifically "related to" the 2020 Olympics in a direct way.

Let me think more carefully. The user's question says: "headquarters is located in the same area as a major station-city integrated development project related to the 2020 Tokyo Olympics."

Let me reconsider. What if 

Now I found a very important clue. From the search results:

1. There's an article about Shibuya station redevelopment being connected to the 2020 Olympics: "2020年の東京オリンピック開催に向けて、東京23区では急ピッチに再開発が進んでいます。中でも最も注目すべきエリアが渋谷駅周辺の大規模再開発です。" (As the 2020 Tokyo Olympics approached, large-scale redevelopment was advancing at full speed across Tokyo's 23 wards. The most notable area is the large-scale redevelopment around Shibuya Station.)

2. Another article from Nikkei BP: "渋谷、五輪までに駅周辺が一新" (Shibuya will be completely renewed around the Olympics) - this confirms Shibuya's redevelopment was Olympics-related.

3. Shibuya Scramble Square opened in February 2023, and Shibuya Stream opened in March 2019. These are massive station-city developments.

So **cent. FORCE** is headquartered in Ebisu (渋谷区恵比寿), which is adjacent to Shibuya. The Shibuya Station redevelopment is a major station-city integrated development project that was accelerated by the 2020 Olympics preparations.

But wait - Ebisu is techn

Now I have a clearer picture. Let me consolidate:

1. **cent. FORCE** is headquartered in Ebisu, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo.
2. It's famous for training female news anchors and announcers.
3. The Shibuya Station area redevelopment is the major station-city integrated development project in the same ward (Shibuya-ku), and it was explicitly linked to the 2020 Olympics.

However, I'm not 100% sure this is the intended answer because:
- Ebisu is close to but not exactly at Shibuya Station
- The Shibuya redevelopment is well-known but maybe not what the user considers "the" major Olympic station development

Let me reconsider whether there might be another interpretation. Actually, wait - could there be another talent agency known specifically for female news anchors?

Actually, looking back at my earlier research results, there's something interesting. Let me re-read:

From search result about 黒田アナ: "関西学院大学在学中から芸能事務所セントフォース関西支部に所属し" - This confirms cent. FORCE as an announcer agency.

And from the 

Now I have solid evidence for both parts of the answer:

1. **cent. FORCE** is headquartered in Ebisu, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo - confirmed by Wikipedia and multiple sources.
2. It specializes in female news anchors and announcers - confirmed by multiple sources.
3. The **Shibuya Station area redevelopment** (渋谷駅周辺まちづくり) is a major station-city integrated development project that was specifically linked to the 2020 Tokyo Olympics.

The connection: cent. FORCE is in Shibuya-ku, and the Shibuya Station redevelopment is the same ward. The Shibuya Station redevelopment was explicitly accelerated by the 2020 Olympics preparations and is a prime example of a "station-city" (駅・まち) integrated development.

However, I want to be more careful. The user's phrasing "in the same area" could mean:
- Same city/ward: Yes, both in Shibuya-ku
- Same neighborhood: Not exactly (Ebisu vs. Shibuya proper)
- Very close proximity: They are about 1-2 km apart

I think the most natural interpretation is "same area" me

Good. Now let me finalize my research by verifying the Shibuya redevelopment-Olympics connection once more and then write my report.

Actually, I want to reconsider whether there might be a different "major station-city integrated development related to the 2020 Olympics" that might fit better than Shibuya Station redevelopment.

Looking at what I've gathered:
1. Shibuya Station redevelopment - explicitly linked to Olympics (multiple sources confirm this), located in Shibuya-ku where cent. FORCE is headquartered.
2. Shinagawa Station new platform - built specifically for Olympics but not really a "station-city integrated development"
3. Ohashi Station redevelopment - near Olympic Park but no talent agency nearby

The Shibuya Station redevelopment seems like the strongest candidate because:
- It IS a major station-city integrated development (渋谷駅周辺まちづくり)
- It IS related to the 2020 Olympics (multiple sources confirm the Olympic link)
- It's in the same area (Shibuya-ku) as cent. FORCE

The user is looking for a specific district in Shenzhen that published the first "区级工业上楼项目企业入驻管理专项实施细则" (special implementation rules for enterprise admission in an industrial building/loft project at the district level) in 2022 or 2023. Let me search for this.

Based on the search results, it's clear that the district is 龙华区 (Longhua District) in Shenzhen. The document is titled "深圳市龙华区工业上楼项目企业入驻管理实施细则（试行）" - Implementation Rules for Enterprise Admission Management of Industrial Loft Projects (Trial) in Longhua District, Shenzhen.

Multiple sources indicate:
1. The征求意见稿 (draft for comments) was published around June-August 2023
2. The official rules appear to have been finalized and published later in 2023

Let me verify whether Longhua was indeed described as the FIRST district-level such implementation rules, and confirm the exact publication date.

Good findings so far. Let me clarify:

1. From the 21jingji article: "这是自今年2月《深圳市"工业上楼"项目审批实施方案》发布后的首个区级'工业上楼'专项政策" - This explicitly states Longhua District's 工业上楼 enterprise admission management implementation rules are THE FIRST district-level special policy since the municipal plan was released.

Wait, there's a discrepancy - the article says "今年2月" but this article is from September 2023. So it means February 2023.

But wait, I need to check - the page summary mentions "July 11, 2025" which seems wrong for an article dated September 4, 2023. Let me re-read... Actually the summary tool might have hallucinated dates. Let me rely on the article date (Sep 4, 2023) and the content mentioning February release.

Actually wait - looking again at the snippet: "近日，深圳龙华区就《龙华区工业上楼项目企业入驻管理实施细则（试行）》公开向社会征求意见，这是自今年2月《深圳市"工业上楼"项目审批实施方案》发布后的首个区级'工业上楼'专项政策。"

This translates to: "Recently, Shenzhen Longhua District publicly solicited opinions on the Implementation Rules... This is the FIRST distric

Now I have a clearer picture. Let me piece together the timeline:

1. The draft for public comment (征求意见稿) was first published on June 16, 2023.
2. A second round of public comments was collected from August 22 to September 2023 (or later, the result #2 says 2023-09-26 and the first one was 2023-06-16).
3. The 21jingji article (dated September 4, 2023) explicitly states: "这是自今年2月《深圳市"工业上楼"项目审批实施方案》发布后的首个区级'工业上楼'专项政策" - confirming Longhua was the FIRST district-level such policy.

But I need to find when the FINAL version was officially published. Let me check the PDF and other sources to see if there's a final date. The search result #5 mentions the collection period was "2023年8月22日" to "2023年9" (incomplete). And the file is called "试行" (trial/for trial implementation), which is a common name for official rules in China. 

Let me also look for the final document. The user asked about "区级工业上楼项目企业入驻管理专项实施细则" - the full name is "龙华区工业上楼项目企业入驻管理实施细则（试行）". The user's description matches thi

The final version's exact publication date isn't clear from what I've found. The document is called "试行" (trial), which in China's regulatory system means it's an official normative document. But I need to find when the final (non-draft) version was actually published.

Let me search for the final version or any notice about its official implementation.

I see that the PDF at szlhq.gov.cn is titled "（征求意见稿）" (draft for comments), so it's the draft version. The final version should have been published after the public comment period ended (September 22, 2023). Let me search for the final official version.

Let me also check if there's a specific notice about when the final version was officially issued.

I'm having trouble finding the exact date when the final version (not just the draft) was officially published. Let me try to access the PDF directly to see if it has a date, and also search for any notice about the official implementation.

The PDF I found is the draft version (征求意见稿). The final version should have been published after the public comment period ended in September 2023. Let me search for the final version or an official notice about it.

Let me also look at the Longhua government website for any notice about the final version.

I see that the final version of the document is not easily findable on the search results. The document I found (the PDF) is still marked as "征求意见稿" (draft for public comment). This is interesting.

Let me look at the 21jingji article more carefully, and also try to find if the final version was ever published. The user's question uses the term "区级工业上楼项目企业入驻管理专项实施细则" - this could be a slightly different name or a description of the same document.

Actually, wait - looking again at the search results from earlier:

From result #6 of my first search:
"洞见湾区丨深圳龙华："工业上楼"的区级探索 - 21财经"
Published: 2023年9月4日

It says: "近日，深圳龙华区就《龙华区工业上楼项目企业入驻管理实施细则（试行）》公开向社会征求意见，这是自今年2月《深圳市"工业上楼"项目审批实施方案》发布后的首个区级'工业上楼'专项政策。"

This clearly states that Longhua's document is the FIRST district-level "industrial loft" special policy.

But the user's specific phrasing is "区级工业上楼项目企业入驻管理专项实施细则" - this might be a general description rather than the exact document name. The exact name of the document is "龙华区工业上楼项目企业入驻管

Let me try to find the final version of the document. The draft was published in June 2023, and the public comment period ended around September 22, 2023. I need to find if a final version was ever published. Let me also look for the "编制说明" (explanatory note) to see if it mentions the expected publication date.

Also, I should check the user's specific phrasing: "区级工业上楼项目企业入驻管理专项实施细则" - this is a description, not necessarily the exact name. The exact name is "龙华区工业上楼项目企业入驻管理实施细则（试行）".

Given all evidence gathered so far:
1. 龙华区 (Longhua District) published "龙华区工业上楼项目企业入驻管理实施细则（试行）"
2. This was explicitly described as "首个区级'工业上楼'专项政策" (the FIRST district-level industrial loft special policy)
3. It was developed in 2023

The document went through these stages:
- March 2023: Started drafting
- June 16, 2023: Draft for public comment released
- August 22 - September 22, 2023: Second round of public comments collected
- After September 2023: Final version expected

But I notice that on the 

I see the first public comment period was from June 16, 2023 to July 15, 2023. Then a second round of comments was collected from August 22 to September 2023. The final version may or may not have been published.

But the user's question is about which district issued the "first district-level industrial building project enterprise admission management special implementation rules" in 2022 or 2023. Even if the final version was never officially published (or if it was only the draft that was made public), the key point is that:

1. Longhua District is the one that created and published this document
2. It was described as the FIRST such district-level policy
3. The year is 2023

Let me check whether there might be another district that published similar rules earlier or later. Let me also verify whether Longhua published any similar documents before or during 2022.

Actually, looking back at my earlier search results:
- Result #9 from my third search mentioned "深圳土地制度改革研究报告" which ment

Let me check the "深圳工业上楼政策推出一年了" article to see if it mentions any other districts having similar rules.

Let me look at the 21jingji article from September 2023 that explicitly called Longhua's document the "first district-level" one, and also try to find the final version of the document. Let me also check the Shenzhen government monthly report for August 2023 that might have more context.

The article on the Longhua government website doesn't explicitly call it the "first" - but the 21jingji article from September 4, 2023 did. Let me now try to find the final version of the document. The user's question uses the term "区级工业上楼项目企业入驻管理专项实施细则" which could be a general description.

Let me also check if there was a later notice about the final version being published.

I've done extensive searching and the evidence is clear. Let me now try to find the final version of the document. The last search result #2 mentions that Longhua issued a notice about abolishing some normative documents in September 2024. Let me check if the 工业上楼实施细则 was among those abolished (which would suggest it was officially published and then later rescinded). But this is a less important detail for the user's question.

The key finding is:
- **District**: 龙华区 (Longhua District)
- **Document name**: 《龙华区工业上楼项目企业入驻管理实施细则（试行）》(Interim Implementation Rules for Enterprise Admission Management of Longhua District Industrial Loft Projects)
- **Year**: 2023
- **Key fact**: It was described as the "首个区级'工业上楼'专项政策" (the first district-level "industrial loft" special policy) in Shenzhen, as reported by 21jingji (21st Century Business Herald) on September 4, 2023

The user's phrasing "区级工业上楼项目企业入驻管理专项实施细则" is a description/summary of the same document, and the year 2023 (1999+24) aligns w

I now have all the evidence I need. Let me compile the final report.

Key findings:
1. The city is Shenzhen (深圳) - confirmed as the host of CHTF since 1999
2. The district is 龙华区 (Longhua District)
3. The document is 《龙华区工业上楼项目企业入驻管理实施细则（试行）》
4. It was published in 2023 (draft released June 16, 2023; public comment period August-September 2023)
5. It was explicitly described as "the first district-level 'industrial loft' special policy" (首个区级"工业上楼"专项政策)
6. The year 2023 = 1999 + 24, matching the user's calculation

The user's phrasing "区级工业上楼项目企业入驻管理专项实施细则" is a general description of this document.

The user is looking for information about a specific land auction event in Shenzhen - the first "concentrated连片区域地块出让" (first batch of contiguous land parcels transfer) that occurred around early 2024. Let me search for this using the specified queries.

I found the key piece of information. From multiple search results, specifically from the Longhua District government website:

"2024年1月，全市首个集中连片区域地块顺利出让，引入央企开发建设。"

This indicates that in January 2024, Shenzhen's first (全市首个) concentrated/contiguous area land parcel was successfully transferred, with a central state-owned enterprise (央企) involved in development.

Let me get more details about this specific event by visiting the relevant pages.

Both pages confirm that in January 2024, Shenzhen's first concentrated contiguous land parcel was transferred and a central state-owned enterprise was introduced for development. Both pages are from Longhua District (龙华区), suggesting this event happened in Longhua District.

Let me search more specifically for details about which district this happened in and what specific project/company was involved.

Now I have more details. From the search results, I can see that:

1. In January 2024, Shenzhen's first (全市首个) concentrated contiguous land parcel was successfully transferred.
2. This happened in Longhua District (龙华区).
3. A central state-owned enterprise (央企) was involved in development.
4. From another result: "中建三局壹品投资公司竞得龙华区华南物流园片区A808-0025地块，总投资100亿" - but this seems to be from February/March 2024.

Wait, let me look more carefully. The Longhua district page mentions:
- "2024年1月，全市首个集中连片区域地块顺利出让，引入央企开发建设。"
- And separately: "龙华区强力推进11个集中连片用地整备"

Let me check if the specific January 2024 event was related to the 华南物流园 or something else. Let me search for more details about what exactly happened in January 2024.

Now I'm getting closer. Let me visit the key pages to find more specific details about this January 2024 event.

From the search results, I can see:
1. The Longhua District government website mentions "2024年1月，全市首个集中连片区域地块顺利出让"
2. There's a reference to "龙华区民治街道华南物流园土地整备利益统筹项目" - but this seems to be from November 2023.
3. From one result: "完成全市首个集中连片区域招拍挂出让" - this is from the Longhua district's 2024 economic plan execution report.

Let me visit the Longhua district's economic plan page and the article about the 华南物流园 to get more details.

Now I have a clearer picture. The article about the A808-0025 parcel was sold on February 29, 2024, and it's part of the 华南物流园 (South China Logistics Park) project in Longhua District. But the Longhua district government website says "2024年1月，全市首个集中连片区域地块顺利出让" - this might refer to a different event.

Let me look more carefully. The Longhua district's 2024 plan execution report says: "完成全市首个集中连片区域招拍挂出让" - completed the city's first concentrated contiguous area auction sale. This could be different from the March 2024 residential land sale.

Wait, let me re-read. The page from the Longhua government's news section said: "2024年1月，全市首个集中连片区域地块顺利出让，引入央企开发建设。" This is from a different page about "龙华区创新集中连片区域开发建设模式" (Longhua District innovates concentrated contiguous area development model).

The news article about the A808-0025 parcel says it was sold on February 29, 2024. But is this the same as the "首个集中连片区域地块出让"?

Actually, looking more carefully at the Longhua district page about their 

Now I have a much clearer picture. Let me check the Longhua district's 2024 economic plan execution report more carefully. It says:

"完成全市首个集中连片区域招拍挂出让，高效完成世宗+衡亿安、广和通等4宗共计12.34公顷产业用地出让。"

This tells us:
- The first concentrated contiguous area auction sale (招拍挂出让) in Shenzhen was completed in 2024
- It involved 4 parcels totaling 12.34 hectares of industrial/innovative industry land
- Companies mentioned: 世宗, 衡亿安, 广和通, and another one

And from the Longhua government page about their innovation model:
"2024年1月，全市首个集中连片区域地块顺利出让，引入央企开发建设。"

So this happened in January 2024.

But wait - I need to verify whether this was specifically in January 2024 or just during 2024. Let me look at the PDF from the Longhua district planning bureau that mentions these companies.

Also, let me search for more specific details about when exactly in January 2024 this happened.

Let me try to find the specific date of this January 2024 event. Let me search for the specific land parcels that were auctioned and when.

Excellent! Now I found a crucial piece of evidence. Let me look at the Sohu article from January 22, 2024 that mentions "龙华这两宗产业用地成功出让" (two industrial land parcels successfully auctioned in Longhua). And there's also an article from December 14, 2023 saying "两宗地总占地约7.5万平米，总建面超31万平米，均于2024年1月12日进行出让" - both parcels were auctioned on January 12, 2024.

Let me visit these pages to get more details.

So I found that on January 12, 2024, two industrial land parcels (A924-0190 and A912-0630) were auctioned in Longhua district. But this is just two parcels, not the "first concentrated contiguous area" event.

The key information from the Longhua district's official website says: "2024年1月，全市首个集中连片区域地块顺利出让" (In January 2024, the first concentrated contiguous area land parcel in the city was successfully transferred). This is a different event.

The 2024 economic plan report also says: "完成全市首个集中连片区域招拍挂出让" (Completed the first concentrated contiguous area auction/land sale in the city), and it involved 4 parcels totaling 12.34 hectares, with companies 世宗+衡亿安, 广和通, 丰宾电子, 海目星 mentioned.

Let me search more specifically for when exactly in 2024 the "first concentrated contiguous area" land was sold, and if it was a different set of parcels or a different type of land (not the two I just found).

Wait, I also need to look at the "海目星" (Haimu Xing) - the search result from the first set of res

Now I'm building a clearer picture. Let me summarize what I've found:

The Longhua District completed "全市首个集中连片区域招拍挂出让" (the city's first concentrated contiguous area auction sale). This involved 4 parcels totaling 12.34 hectares:
1. A924-0190 - sold to 丰宾电子 (Fengbin Electronics), ~50 million yuan
2. A912-0630 - sold jointly to 衡亿安科技 and 世宗自动化 (Shizong Automation), ~41.8 million yuan  
3. 海目星 - A914-0335, sold on May 7, 2024 for 41.7 million yuan (but this seems later)
4. 广和通 - unknown date

Wait, but the January 2024 date is specifically mentioned in the Longhua government page: "2024年1月，全市首个集中连片区域地块顺利出让". And the two parcels A924-0190 and A912-0630 were auctioned on January 12, 2024.

But 海目星 got its parcel on May 7, 2024. So maybe the "first concentrated contiguous area" isn't referring to all 4 of these together.

Let me reconsider. The Longhua district says:
- "2024年1月，全市首个集中连片区域地块顺利出让，引入央企开发建设。"
- The economic plan says: "完成全市首个集中连片区域招拍挂出让，高效完成世宗+衡亿安、广和通等4宗共计12.34公顷产业用地出让。"

Thes

The Nandu newspaper article also doesn't give more specific details. Let me try a different approach and look for the specific event in January 2024 in Shenzhen's land transaction records. The key information I have is:

1. In January 2024, Shenzhen's first concentrated contiguous area land parcel was successfully transferred (全市首个集中连片区域地块顺利出让)
2. This happened in Longhua District (龙华区) - both government pages are from Longhua
3. A central state-owned enterprise (央企) was involved
4. The Longhua district's economic plan mentions 4 parcels totaling 12.34 hectares with companies: 世宗+衡亿安, 广和通, 丰宾电子, 海目星
5. Two of these (A924-0190 to 丰宾电子, and A912-0630 to 衡亿安+世宗) were sold on January 12, 2024

But there's a question: the "first" was the one in January, and the 4-parcel set of 12.34 hectares was the "first auction" (招拍挂). Or is the "first" the same as the 4-parcel set?

Let me also look for the "海目星" and "广和通" land transactions to see if they were part of the same batch.

Actually, let me a

I have a good amount of information now, but I need to be more specific. The "first" event in January 2024 in Shenzhen for the "concentrated contiguous area" is well-attested, and it was in Longhua District. The Nandu article and the two Longhua government pages all state: "2024年1月，全市首个集中连片区域地块顺利出让，引入央企开发建设。"

The two parcels sold on January 12, 2024 (A912-0630 and A924-0190) were part of this first batch. But we need to confirm whether these two alone constitute the "first concentrated contiguous area" or if there were more.

Let me look at the Longhua district's economic plan report again - it says "完成全市首个集中连片区域招拍挂出让" and separately mentions "世宗+衡亿安、广和通等4宗共计12.34公顷产业用地出让" as a high-efficiency result, not necessarily the same as the "first" event. The 4-parcel 12.34-hectare set may be a different, later event (e.g., the May 2024 sale of 海目星's parcel).

Actually, let me re-read the Longhua economic plan more carefully:
"完成全市首个集中连片区域招拍挂出让，高效完成世宗+衡亿安、广和通等4宗共计12.34公顷产业用地出让。"

This seems t

Let me visit the Longhua district economic plan execution page again more carefully and also search for 广和通 specifically.

Let me search specifically for 广和通 land parcel in Longhua district.

Now let me try to find 广和通 specifically. It may not be a land parcel auction but rather a different arrangement related to the concentrated contiguous development.

Actually, let me revisit what I've gathered:

From the Longhua district's innovation article page (post_11858165.html and post_11858166.html), it says: "2024年1月，全市首个集中连片区域地块顺利出让，引入央企开发建设。" The key word is "引入央企" (introduced a central SOE). This might mean that the first step was the land transfer, and then a central SOE was brought in to develop it. The two parcels sold on January 12, 2024 (A912-0630 and A924-0190) were sold to companies like 衡亿安科技 and 世宗自动化 - these don't sound like central SOEs.

Wait, looking at the March 2024 residential land sale: "中建壹品联合体以51.79亿元将龙华民治街道A808-0025宗地收入囊中" - 中建壹品 (China State Construction Yipin) IS a central SOE (央企). And this parcel is part of the 华南物流园 project which is one of Shenzhen's concentrated contiguous development areas.

But this was sold on February 29, 2024, not January 2024.

Let me try a different angle. The phrase "引入央企开发建设" (introducing central SOEs for development) from the Longhua government page might mean that after the land was auctioned, a central SOE was later brought in to develop it. The two industrial parcels sold on January 12, 2024 (A912-0630 and A924-0190) were sold to private companies (丰宾电子, 衡亿安, 世宗自动化). But the key point is that this was the first time a concentrated contiguous area had its land auctioned in Shenzhen.

Now, I also found that the Nandu article says: "为做好全年各项工作打响'发令枪'。1月2日，新年开工第一天，全市2024年首批新项目集中开工仪式在光明区举行" - this is about project starts, not land auctions.

Let me look at the overall picture:
- The "first concentrated contiguous area land transfer" (首个集中连片区域地块出让) happened in January 2024
- It was in Longhua District (龙华区)
- Two industrial parcels (A912-0630 and A924-0190) were auctioned on January 12, 2024
- These were sold to companies including 丰宾电子, 衡亿安科技, and 世宗自动化
- The district's economic plan mentions 4 parcels total

Now I have the full picture of Longhua District's innovation model:

**"政府统筹+国企做地+央企开发" (Government coordination + SOE land preparation + Central SOE development)**

Key facts:
1. In January 2024, Shenzhen's first concentrated contiguous area land parcel was successfully transferred in Longhua District.
2. The mechanism is "政府统筹+国企做地+央企开发" - government coordinates, SOE does the land preparation, and central SOE develops it.
3. The two industrial parcels (A912-0630 and A924-0190) were auctioned on January 12, 2024.
4. These were sold to companies like 丰宾电子, 衡亿安科技, and 世宗自动化 - these may be the "国企做地" (SOE doing the land preparation) entities rather than the developers themselves.
5. Later a central SOE was introduced for actual development ("引入央企开发建设").

Actually wait - looking more carefully at the fixed asset investment article from December 2024:
"九龙山数字城丰宾电子、广和通、海目星等项目用地成功出让，迈动科技园、湾区创新科技大厦等重点项目顺利开工"

These companies are all located in Jiulongshan Digital City area.

Let me now compile

Let me now search specifically for what central SOE was introduced for development of these parcels.

Let me visit the Sina Finance article about Longhua district's concentrated contiguous development for more details.

Now let me try to identify the central SOE. Looking at the parcels auctioned:

1. A924-0190 → 丰宾电子半导体科技有限公司 (sold January 12, 2024)
2. A912-0630 → 衡亿安科技有限公司 + 世宗自动化设备有限公司 (sold January 12, 2024)

But these are not central SOEs. The phrase "引入央企开发建设" suggests that after the land was transferred/auctioned, a central SOE was brought in for actual construction and development.

Looking at other sources:
- From the 南都 newspaper article about 龙华 fixed asset investment: "九龙山数字城丰宾电子、广和通、海目星等项目用地成功出让"
- 海目星 got its parcel on May 7, 2024

Let me check if there's more information about which central SOE was involved in the Longhua concentrated contiguous area development. Let me look at the March 2024 residential land sale again - 中建壹品联合体 bought A808-0025 as part of 华南物流园 project.

Actually, wait - maybe I'm conflating things. Let me reconsider:

The Longhua district government website describes TWO separate achievements:
1. "2024年1月，全市首个集中连片区域地块顺利出让，引入央企开发建设。" - First concentrated contiguous are

I found a key piece of information. The search result from 惠州土地网 says: "通信模组龙头厂商广和通拟深圳龙华拿地" (Communication module leader Guanhetong plans to get land in Shenzhen Longhua). This was published on July 26, 2023, and it says: "拟规划建筑面积约2.5万㎡" (planned building area about 25,000 sqm).

So 广和通 (Fibocom) is a major communication module company that planned to get land in Longhua. This would be for the concentrated contiguous area development.

Now let me look at the specific details. The Longhua economic plan mentions 4 parcels totaling 12.34 hectares with companies 世宗+衡亿安, 广和通, 丰宾电子, 海目星. We know:
- A924-0190 (50M yuan) → 丰宾电子 - Jan 12, 2024
- A912-0630 (41.8M yuan) → 衡亿安+世宗 - Jan 12, 2024
- Some parcel → 广和通 (planned ~25,000 sqm)
- A914-0335 (41.7M yuan) → 海目星 - May 7, 2024

The 12.34 hectares = 123,400 sqm. 
- A924-0190: I need to find the size. 
- A912-0630: I need to find the size.
- 广和通: ~25,000 sqm
- A914-0335: 23,644.46 sqm

If A914-0335 is 23,644 sqm and 广和通 is about 25,000 sqm, that'

The page didn't load. Let me try a different search to find the specific details about 广和通's land parcel in Longhua.

I found a key page! The search result from the Longhua government website (post_10734728.html) is about "智能通信模组全球智造基地重点产业项目遴选方案" (Intelligent Communication Module Global Smart Manufacturing Base Key Industry Project Selection Plan) and it mentions: "广和通智能制造中心，拟规划建筑面积约6.4万平方米" (Fibocom Smart Manufacturing Center, planned building area about 64,000 sqm).

Let me visit this page to get more details.

Now I have the details about 广和通's parcel:
- Total land area: approximately 23,430 sqm (≤23,430 sqm)
- Planned building area: about 64,000 sqm (≈6.4万平方米)

So for the 4 parcels totaling 12.34 hectares (= 123,400 sqm):
1. A924-0190 → 丰宾电子: need to find the size
2. A912-0630 → 衡亿安+世宗: need to find the size
3. 广和通: ~23,430 sqm
4. A914-0335 → 海目星: 23,644.46 sqm

Total of known parcels: 23,430 + 23,644 = 47,074 sqm. The remaining: 123,400 - 47,074 = 76,326 sqm, which would be split between A924-0190 and A912-0630.

Let me check if these two parcels were sold as a combined transaction or separately. From the earlier article, they were announced together on December 14, 2023, and scheduled for auction on January 12, 2024, and they were both in the "九龙山" (Jiulongshan) or "观湖" (Guanhu) area. This is one of the 10 concentrated contiguous development areas in Longhua.

But the key point for the user's question is: the "first concentrated contiguous area land transfer" (首个集中连片区域地块出让) happened in **

I now have enough information to compile my report. Let me summarize everything:

**Key Finding**: Shenzhen's first concentrated contiguous area land parcel transfer (首个集中连片区域地块出让) occurred in **January 2024** in **Longhua District (龙华区)**.

**Evidence**:
1. Multiple official Longhua District government pages explicitly state: "2024年1月，全市首个集中连片区域地块顺利出让" (In January 2024, the first concentrated contiguous area land parcel in the city was successfully transferred)
2. A Nandu newspaper (南都) article from December 11, 2024 also confirms: "2024年1月，全市首个集中连片区域地块顺利出让"
3. The Sina Finance article (repost of a Shenzhen government report) from November 29, 2024 also states: "2024年1月，全市首个集中连片区域地块顺利出让"
4. The Longhua district's 2024 economic plan execution report says: "完成全市首个集中连片区域招拍挂出让" (Completed the first concentrated contiguous area auction/land sale in the city)

**Specific details**:
- Date: January 2024 (two industrial parcels were auctioned on January 12, 2024)
- Location: Longhua District 

The user is looking for a large-scale development project in Shenzhen that:
1. Is under construction or planned
2. Has a development area exceeding 100万平方米 (1 million square meters)
3. Is NOT a sports venue
4. Is comparable to the Shibuya Station redevelopment in Tokyo

Let me search for this systematically using the queries they've suggested.

I found some interesting leads. Let me dig deeper into specific projects:

1. **白石洲 (Baishizhou)** - ~500万平方米, very large urban renewal project in Nanshan
2. **深圳湾超级总部基地 (Shenzhen Bay Super Headquarters Base)** - massive CBD development
3. **西丽枢纽 (Xili Hub)** - 360万平方米 station-city integration
4. **前海合作区地下新城** - 660万平方米 underground
5. The Qianhai (前海) project
6. A China Resources stalled mega-project

Let me search for more specific information on the biggest ones, especially those comparable to Shibuya Station redevelopment.

Good, I'm getting a clearer picture. Let me now search for more specific details on the top candidates:

1. **白石洲 (Baishizhou)** - ~500万m² total construction area, Nanshan District - urban renewal project (NOT station-city integration)
2. **深圳湾超级总部基地 (Shenzhen Bay Super Headquarters Base)** - ~520万m² total construction area, Nanshan District - CBD development
3. **西丽枢纽 (Xili Hub)** - ~360万m² station-city integration area + ~146万m² station itself - station-city integration comparable to Shibuya
4. **前海综合交通枢纽** - ~215.9万m² transportation hub - massive station-city integration

Let me search more specifically about projects comparable to Shibuya Station redevelopment that exceed 1 million sqm.

Now I have much clearer picture. Let me summarize what I've found:

**Shibuya Station Redevelopment:**
- Site area: 42,700 m² (the whole station district)
- Total floor area: ~693,900 m² (across all four blocks)
- The redevelopment covers about 4.3 ha (43,000 m²) for the station block alone
- Shibuya Scramble Square alone is 276,000 m²

So the entire Shibuya Station District Redevelopment complex has a total floor area of about 693,900 m² across the full 42,700 m² site.

The user is looking for a Shenzhen project that:
1. Exceeds 100万m² (1,000,000 m²) in development area
2. Is under construction or planned
3. Is NOT a sports venue
4. Is comparable to the Shibuya Station redevelopment

The key question is: "comparable" - this could mean:
- Similar in scale (but Shibuya is only ~694,000 m², so anything over 1 million would be larger)
- Similar type (station-city integration / TOD)
- Similar concept (major urban redevelopment)

Let me now identify the top candidates:

1. **白石洲城市更新 (Baishi

Excellent! Now I have a very clear picture. The Qianhai International Hub Center (前海国际枢纽中心) is particularly interesting because the Nfnews article actually lists "Shibuya Future Light" (渋谷 future light) as a classic TOD case study, and the Qianhai project is in the same category. The Qianhai project:
- Total site area: 20万㎡
- Total floor area: ~215万㎡
- Is under construction
- Is explicitly described as a "third-generation TOD (站城一体)" project
- Is compared to global TOD landmarks like Shibuya, Hudson Yards, King's Cross, and West Kowloon

This is a very strong match. But the user said the project should be "exceeding 100万平方米" in development area, and the Qianhai project is 215万m², so that works.

But there are other even larger projects. Let me also look at the Qianhai International Hub Center as a whole - the Baidu result says "total floor area exceeding 2..." (cut off). And the Eplus design page mentions a shopping center of 242,000m².

Let me also check the Xili Hub more carefully, a

Now I have a comprehensive picture of the major Shenzhen projects exceeding 100万平方米. Let me summarize:

**Top Candidates:**

### 1. 前海国际枢纽中心 (Qianhai International Hub Center) - **BEST MATCH**
- **District**: Qianhai/Shenzhen Bay (宝安区/南山区)
- **Total floor area**: Exceeding 200万平方米 (>2 million m²), with one source saying ~215万㎡
- **Site area**: 20 hectares (20万㎡)
- **Status**: Under construction, main structure topped out Sept 2023, decoration phase May 2026
- **Type**: Station-city integration (TOD 4.0) - directly comparable to Shibuya
- **Key features**: 9 super high-rise buildings, cross-border port, 3 metro + 2 intercity lines, expected 750,000 daily passengers
- **Global comparison**: Explicitly compared to Shibuya in the Nfnews article (which listed "Shibuya Future Light" as a classic TOD case)
- **Why it's the best match**: It's a station-city integration project (like Shibuya), exceeds 100万m², is under construction, and is not a sports venue

### 2. 深圳湾超级总部基地 (Shenzhen Bay Super

Now I have all the information needed. Let me compile my comprehensive report.

Summary of findings:

The strongest candidate matching ALL criteria is **前海国际枢纽中心 (Qianhai International Hub Center)**:
- Located in Qianhai/Shenzhen Bay area (宝安区/南山区)
- Total floor area exceeding 200万平方米 (>2 million m²), with some sources saying ~215万㎡
- Under construction, topping out in Sept 2023, decoration phase since May 2026
- Explicit station-city integration (TOD 4.0) - directly comparable conceptually to Shibuya Station redevelopment
- Listed alongside Shibuya Future Light as a classic TOD landmark comparison
- NOT a sports venue

Secondary candidates worth mentioning include 深圳湾超级总部基地 (~520万m²), 白石洲城市更新 (~500万m²), 西丽综合交通枢纽 (~360万m²), and 前海地下新城 (~660万m² underground).

The user is looking for a large-scale development project in Longhua District, Shenzhen, with over 1 million square meters of development area. Let me search systematically for this.

I found some interesting leads. Let me search more specifically for large-scale projects in Longhua District. The key candidates so far:

1. 龙华商业中心 (Longhua Commercial Center) - a major urban renewal project
2. 梅林关城市更新项目 (Meilin Pass Urban Renewal) - at Shenzhen International Holdings, 96000㎡ land, 490265.77㎡ building area
3. 深国际华南物流园 - 69.4万平方米 of comprehensive complex

Let me search for more specific large-scale projects and also look at the "龙华商业中心" project which seems very promising.

Very promising findings. Let me focus on two major candidates:

1. **梅林关片区 (Meilin Pass Area)** - Described as adding 180万平方米 of new development, total investment nearly 700 billion yuan. This is described as comparable to Hudson Yards in NYC and La Défense in Paris.

2. **深圳北站国际商务区 (Shenzhen North Station International Business District)** - Planning area of 12.71 sq km, with various projects including 超核万象中心 (38.8万㎡), 北站壹号 (16万㎡).

Let me search more specifically for the 梅林关 project and also look at other large-scale projects.

Now I have some very strong candidates. Let me dig deeper into the key ones:

1. **梅林关片区 (Meilin Pass Area)** - 180万平方米 new development, total investment ~700 billion yuan, compared to Hudson Yards NYC and La Défense Paris
2. **壹方天地 (One Square天地)** - area about 75 hectares, 总建筑面积约366万㎡ - this is huge!
3. **深圳北站国际商务区** - planning area 12.71 sq km

Let me search more specifically for 壹方天地 and its scale, as well as other projects.

Excellent findings. Let me compile what I've found so far:

Key candidates for large-scale projects (>1 million sq m) in Longhua District:

1. **壹方天地 / 壹成中心 (One Square天地)** - Total building area approximately 320万平方米 (including commercial 60万㎡), developed by Hongrongyuan (鸿荣源). Located in 龙华商圈.

2. **梅林关片区城市更新项目** - Total new development of 180万平方米, investment ~700亿元. Compared to Hudson Yards NYC and La Défense Paris.

3. **深圳国际会展中心** - Located in 宝安区福海街道 (NOT Longhua District).

4. **华侨城四海华亭** - Total building area ~56万平方米.

5. **深圳北站国际商务区** - Planning area 12.71 sq km total.

Let me search more specifically for some other candidates.

Now let me look deeper into the strongest candidates:

1. **壹方天地 (One Square天地)** / 壹成中心 - Total building area approximately 320万平方米, including 60万平方米 commercial cluster. Developed by Hongrongyuan (鸿荣源). Located in 龙华商圈.

2. **梅林关片区城市更新项目** - 180万平方米 new development, compared to Hudson Yards NYC.

3. **九龙山数字经济产业新城** - 68公顷, 百万平方米产业用房.

Let me now search specifically for more details about 壹方天地 and also explore other mega projects like 北站超核万象中心 etc.

Now I have a very clear picture. Let me look at the key finding from the last search - the fivehe (五和) hub is in Longgang, not Longhua. But the Meilin Pass (梅林关) project in Longhua is the one that's most interesting. 

Key candidates in Longhua District with >1 million sqm:

1. **梅林关片区 (Meilin Pass Area)**: 180万+ new development, with 250万㎡ for the station area, 200万㎡ for the South China logistics park, 100万㎡ for the water reservoir area. This is a major project.

2. **壹方天地/壹成中心 (One Square天地 / Yicheng Center)**: ~320万㎡ total building area, by Hongrongyuan, in the Longhua commercial district. The 60万㎡ of commercial space and 320万㎡ of total.

3. **北站超核万象中心 (Shenzhen North Station Super Core MixC)**: 75万㎡, a single project, not over 100万.

4. **深国际万科和颂轩 (Shenzhen International Vanke Heshengxuan)**: Part of the Meilin Pass urban renewal, with total investment of 126亿元.

Let me also check the "湾区壹方超级购物天地" which was mentioned as 50万㎡ commercial core.

Let me now look more specifically at th

Now let me get more details about the Meilin Pass project and also look at the 北站超核万象中心 (MixC) which is 75万平方米. Also, let me check for more details about the 壹方天地 / 壹成中心 project.

Good. Let me now search specifically for any comparison between Longhua projects and Shibuya Station redevelopment to understand what project might match that criterion.

Excellent! Now I've found several very important candidates:

1. **壹成中心花园 (Yicheng Center Garden)** / 壹方天地 by Hongrongyuan - Total building area approximately **320万平方米**, including 60万平方米 commercial cluster. This is a mega-project in 龙华商圈.

2. **海岸城项目 in 龙华** - 总建筑面积超过百万平方米 (1086760㎡). Let me check this more carefully.

3. **梅林关片区城市更新** - 180万平方米 new development, total project ~250万㎡ for the station area + 200万㎡ for 华南物流园.

Let me now investigate the 海岸城项目 in龙华 and also look deeper into the 北站国际商务区.

Now I have a very clear picture. Let me also check the 北站国际商务区 total planned building area and look for any other projects that might be comparable to Shibuya Station redevelopment.

Now I have a comprehensive picture of the major projects in Longhua District. Let me also look for the "Shibuya Station" comparison, as the user mentioned a project "comparable to Shibuya Station redevelopment in scale (massive urban redevelopment)."

The key large-scale projects in Longhua District (all >100万㎡) are:

1. **北站国际商务区 (Shenzhen North Station International Business District)**: 
   - Total area: 12.71 sq km, with a core area of 6.1 sq km
   - Total building area: over 1,000万㎡ (over 10 million square meters)
   - Total investment: over 2,000亿
   - This is a massive, long-term plan. The sub-district (中轴) is being built as a "city's second center" (中环)
   - It's a TOD/urban redevelopment at a national level

2. **梅林关片区 (Meilin Pass Area)**:
   - 180万+ new development, with 250万㎡ for the station area, 200万㎡ for the South China logistics park, 100万㎡ for the water reservoir area
   - Total: about 430-500万㎡
   - Total investment: ~700亿
   - Compared to Hudson Yards NYC and La Défe

Let me now compile my comprehensive findings. The key candidates are clear:

1. **壹成中心花园 / 壹方天地 (Yicheng Center Garden / One Square天地)** by Hongrongyuan - Total building area ~320万㎡ in 龙华商圈

2. **梅林关片区城市更新项目** - 180万+ new development, total project ~430-500万㎡

3. **北站国际商务区 (Shenzhen North Station International Business District)** - Planning area 12.71 sq km, core area 6.1 sq km, total building area over 1000万㎡ (but this is a very long-term plan)

4. **龙华海岸城 (Hai'an City in Longhua)** - Total building area 108.6万㎡

5. **深圳北站超核万象中心** - 75万㎡ (single phase), TOD model

Now let me determine which ones specifically meet ALL criteria:
- Located in 龙华区 ✓ for all above
- Under construction or planned ✓ for most of these
- NOT a sports venue ✓ all are mixed-use/commercial/residential
- Comparable to Shibuya Station redevelopment ✓ 北站商务区 and 梅林关片区 most comparable
- Over 1 million sq meters ✓ 北站商务区 (>1000万), 梅林关片区 (>180万), 壹方天地 (>320万), 海岸城 (>108万)

Let me visit one more source to confirm details

Now I have a very comprehensive picture. Let me also look for the "Shibuya Station" comparison in the context of Shenzhen/Longhua, and also check the 北站超核万象中心 (MixC) more closely as it's a specific project that is under construction.

Let me also look at the 1+7 view of Longhua to get a full list of the major projects.

Now I have a very comprehensive picture. Let me also check the Meilin Pass project's specific details and the "Shibuya" comparison to make sure I'm not missing something.

Let me also look for the specific Meilin Pass project's total area with the 250万 + 200万 + 100万 = 550万 figure.

Now I have the full picture. The Meilin Pass project is actually even larger than I initially thought - total planned building area of about 1000万㎡ (10 million sq m), with 550万㎡ new construction. This is truly massive.

Let me now compile all candidates and write the final report. Let me also check if there's any specific project that has been explicitly compared to Shibuya Station.

Now I have comprehensive information about all major projects in Longhua District. Let me compile my findings into a comprehensive report.

Let me summarize the candidates:

**Tier 1 - Mega Projects (>5 million sq m total planned construction area)**:
1. **深圳北站国际商务区 (Shenzhen North Station International Business District)**: 
   - Total planning area: 12.71 sq km, core area: 6.1 sq km
   - Total planned building area: over 1000万㎡ (over 10 million sq m)
   - Total investment: over 2000亿
   - Status: Long-term plan, some parts under active development
   - Type: TOD/urban redevelopment, "city's second center" (中环)
   - Comparable to Shibuya? It's a massive urban redevelopment around a major station, but not explicitly compared to Shibuya

2. **梅林关片区 (Meilin Pass Area)**:
   - Total planned building area: ~1000万㎡ (450万现状 + 550万新增)
   - New construction: ~550万㎡ (250万 for station area + 200万 for logistics park + 100万 for water reservoir area)
   - Total investment: ~700亿
   - Status: Under 

Now I have all the information I need. Let me compile the comprehensive report.

Let me also check one more thing - the specific details about the 梅林关 project's comparison to Shibuya or other international examples.

Now I have all the information I need. Let me compile the comprehensive report.

Key findings:

1. **深圳北站国际商务区 (Shenzhen North Station International Business District)** - The largest project in Longhua
   - Total planning area: 12.71 sq km, core area: 6.1 sq km
   - Total planned building area: over 1000万㎡ (over 10 million sq m)
   - Total investment: over 2000亿
   - Status: Long-term plan (20+ years), active development since early on
   - This is a massive urban redevelopment around a major rail hub

2. **梅林关片区 (Meilin Pass Area)** - Second largest
   - Total planned building area: ~1000万㎡ (450万现状 + 550万新增)
   - New construction: ~550万㎡ total (250万 station area + 200万 logistics park + 100万 water reservoir)
   - Total investment: ~700亿
   - Compared to Hudson Yards NYC and La Défense Paris
   - TOD/rail-oriented mega development

3. **壹成中心花园 / 壹方天地 (Yicheng Center / One Square天地)** by Hongrongyuan
   - Total building area: ~320万㎡
   - Commercial cluster: 60万㎡
   - Status: Under activ

Now I have all the data. Let me also check the "Shibuya comparison" more specifically. The user asked for a project "comparable to Shibuya Station redevelopment in scale (massive urban redevelopment)." In the Shenzhen/Longhua context, the most likely projects that would be described this way are:

1. **北站国际商务区** - A massive station-area urban redevelopment, but it's a 10+ year plan
2. **梅林关片区** - A specific site-based mega development, directly compared to Hudson Yards

The user also asked for a project "over 1 million square meters of development area." This is a key filter. The candidates that meet ALL criteria:
- >100万㎡ development area
- In Longhua District
- Not a sports venue
- Under construction or planned
- Comparable to Shibuya-style massive urban redevelopment

**Top candidates:**
1. **梅林关片区 (Meilin Pass Area)**: ~1000万㎡ total, 550万新, under active development, compared to Hudson Yards. This is a single defined project (not a whole district) and is the most "Shibuya-like" in i

I now have all the information I need. Let me write a comprehensive final report.

To summarize, the key projects in Longhua District that are >100万㎡ and match the user's criteria are:

1. **梅林关片区 (Meilin Pass Area)** - ~1000万㎡ total, 550万新, under active planning/construction
2. **深圳北站国际商务区** - >1000万㎡ planned, very long-term (decades), partially developed
3. **壹方天地/Yicheng Center** - ~320万㎡, actively developing
4. **龙华海岸城** - ~108.7万㎡, actively developing

The project most comparable to Shibuya Station redevelopment would be either 北站商务区 or 梅林关片区 as they both involve massive transit-oriented urban redevelopment around rail hubs.

I need to verify three facts:
1. The first year of the China International High-Tech Fair (CHTF/高交会)
2. A policy about "龙华区 工业上楼 企业入驻 管理 实施细则" published in 2023, described as the first district-level such policy in Shenzhen
3. A land auction event in Longhua District in January 2024

Let me search for all three simultaneously.

Good, I have initial results. Let me now dig deeper into each fact.

1. CHTF: Multiple sources say it was launched in 1999. I can see a Baidu Baike result and the CHTF official site confirms this. Let me visit the official page for more details.

2. For the Longhua "工业上楼" policy: The search results show that the implementation rules were indeed published in 2023 (draft started March 2023). I need to confirm it was described as the FIRST district-level such policy in Shenzhen. Let me visit some of these pages.

3. For the land auction in January 2024 in Longhua: The search results don't clearly show a January 2024 land auction event. The closest is the March 2024 residential land auction. Let me search more specifically.

Excellent! Now I have confirmation for facts 1 and 2. Let me now search more specifically for the January 2024 land auction in Longhua.

I found a key result. Result #5 from the second search is very relevant: "全力推进集中连片区域开发！龙华一低效物流仓储用地迎来跃升" from szlhq.gov.cn. The snippet says "一开年便成功将项目范围内两块居住用地率先出让" - this suggests that at the beginning of 2024, they successfully auctioned two residential plots in a concentrated area. Let me visit this page and also the article about the January 2024 land auction.

Also, result #9 mentions a January 25, 2024 announcement for a residential land plot in Longhua. Let me visit these pages.

Let me search more specifically for "首个集中连片区域地块出让" to see if there's a January 2024 event specifically described as such.

I now have very clear evidence for all three facts. Let me visit the key source for fact 3 to get the exact quote.

For fact 1: CHTF was first held in 1999. The official CHTF page says "Since 1999" and the 2018 review says "launched in 1999."

For fact 2: The 21世纪经济报道 article explicitly states "这是自今年2月《深圳市"工业上楼"项目审批实施方案》发布后的首个区级'工业上楼'专项政策" - confirming it was the first district-level such policy.

For fact 3: Multiple sources confirm this:
- From szlhq.gov.cn (Longhua government): "2024年1月，全市首个集中连片区域地块顺利出让"
- From Longhua's 2024 economic plan: "完成全市首个集中连片区域招拍挂出让"
- From Dutenews: "完成全市首个集中连片区域地块招拍挂出让"

Let me visit the Longhua government page to get the exact quote.

Let me visit the Baidu Baike page for CHTF and also re-visit the 21Jingji article to get the exact quote about "first district-level" policy.

I have enough evidence from my searches. Let me compile the findings:

1. **CHTF first held**: Multiple authoritative sources confirm it was launched in **1999**.
   - Official CHTF website (chtf.com): "Since 1999, the China Hi-Tech Fair (CHTF) has been successfully held for 26 editions"
   - Review article: "China High-Tech Fair (CHTF), launched in 1999..."
   - Baidu Baike: "was transformed into the first Hi-Tech Fair in 1999"

2. **龙华区工业上楼实施细则 as FIRST district-level policy**: Confirmed by 21世纪经济报道 article:
   - Exact quote: "这是自今年2月《深圳市'工业上楼'项目审批实施方案》发布后的首个区级'工业上楼'专项政策" (This is the first district-level specialized policy for "industrial building" since the Shenzhen Municipal Government's Implementation Plan for Industrial Building Pilot Projects was issued in February of this year)
   - The document was started in March 2023, and the draft was released on June 16, 2023.

3. **January 2024 concentrated contiguous area land auction in Longhua**: Confirmed by multiple Longhua governm

The user wants me to confirm the existence of a specific large-scale development project in Shenzhen's Longhua District (龙华区) that has a development area exceeding 100万平方米 (1 million square meters) and is under construction or planned. They want me to search for specific projects and determine which one is most likely the answer, particularly one that could be "comparable" to the Shibuya Station redevelopment in Tokyo.

Let me search for the candidate projects mentioned.

I found some very useful information. Let me now look more closely at the key candidates:

1. **龙华海岸城 (Longhua Coast City)**: Total building area exceeds 1 million square meters (1,086,760 sqm or "超百万平"). The project is a major old village reconstruction/urban renewal project. It was approved in 2022 and is in the process of being built.

2. **深圳北站国际商务区 (Shenzhen North Station International Business District)**: Core area 6.1 sq km, total building area over 10 million sqm ("规划建设超千万平方米建筑面积"), planning investment exceeds 200 billion yuan. This is clearly comparable to Shibuya Station redevelopment - it's a TOD/station-area development around Shenzhen North Railway Station.

3. **壹方天地**: Commercial area only about 60万㎡ (commercial floor area), total project likely larger but primarily commercial-focused.

Let me search more specifically for projects comparable to Shibuya Station redevelopment.

Now I have quite clear information about the candidates. Let me summarize:

1. **深圳北站国际商务区 (Shenzhen North Station International Business District)**:
   - Planning area: ~970万㎡ total (规划面积为970万平米), commercial building scale 550万㎡
   - Total construction area: 超千万平方米 (over 10 million sqm)
   - Core area: 6.1 sq km
   - Total investment: over 2000亿元
   - This is a massive TOD station-area development around Shenzhen North Railway Station
   - This is clearly comparable to Shibuya Station redevelopment in Tokyo

2. **龙华海岸城 (Longhua Coast City)**:
   - Total building area: 超百万平 (over 1 million sqm, specifically about 1,086,760 sqm)
   - Located at 龙华街道和平路与人民路交汇处西北侧
   - Urban renewal project on former 第三工业区 land
   - Approved in 2022

3. **壹方天地**: Commercial floor area ~60万㎡, primarily commercial-focused

Now let me check what makes something "comparable to Shibuya Station redevelopment." Shibuya Station redevelopment is one of the largest urban redevelopment projects in Tokyo - it involv

Now let me also check the Shibuya redevelopment comparison and look at 龙华海岸城 more carefully. Let me visit the page about 深圳北站商务区城市设计 by Mecanoo to understand its comparison to Shibuya.

Let me now visit the Longhua government page about 北站国际商务区 for official planning details, and also check on 龙华海岸城's current construction status.

Let me now search for more specific information about which project is commonly compared to Shibuya Station redevelopment. The question specifically asks about a project "comparable" to Shibuya Station redevelopment in Tokyo.

Now let me look at the specific comparison between 深圳北站商务区 and Shibuya Station redevelopment. Let me search more specifically for this comparison.

Let me now visit the Nikkei Asia article about Shibuya redevelopment and see if there's any comparison made with Shenzhen projects.

Let me now try to find the specific question or context that asks about a project in Longhua District comparable to Shibuya Station redevelopment. This might be from a quiz, exam, or article.

Now let me look at the 北站商务区 more carefully. Based on my research:

From the 2020 archina article: "规划商办建筑面积约550万㎡" - planned commercial and office building area about 5.5 million sqm.

From the 知乎 article (2020): "规划面积为970万平米，商业建筑面积550万平米，建筑超百栋、建筑规模超千万平方米、具有全球影响力的'国际会客厅'" - Planning area of 970万㎡, commercial building scale of 550万㎡, over 100 buildings with total construction exceeding 10 million sqm.

So 深圳北站国际商务区 has:
- Planning area: ~970万㎡ or ~12.71平方公里 (overall 北站国际商务区 scope)
- Total construction area: 超千万平方米 (over 10 million sqm)
- Commercial/O办公 building area: ~550万㎡

And 龙华海岸城 has:
- Total construction area: ~1,086,760㎡ (约108万㎡)

Both exceed 100万㎡.

Now let me determine which project is being referred to as comparable to Shibuya Station redevelopment:

Shibuya Station redevelopment characteristics:
1. Massive TOD/station-area development centered around a major railway station
2. Multi-functional complex (offices, retail, hotels, cultural facilities, parks)
3. Major urban trans

Let me search specifically for what Chinese articles or exams compare Longhua/Shenzhen projects to Shibuya Station redevelopment.

Based on my research so far, let me consolidate what I've found:

**Candidate 1: 深圳北站国际商务区 (Shenzhen North Station International Business District)**
- Located in Longhua District
- Planning area: 970万㎡ (~12.71平方公里 overall 北站国际商务区 scope)
- Total construction area: 超千万平方米 (over 10 million sqm)
- Commercial/O办公 building area: ~550万㎡
- Focus: TOD station-area development around Shenzhen North Railway Station
- This is a major urban redevelopment, comparable to Shibuya in the sense of being a station-centered massive development
- It's a "comparable" project in that it's a large-scale, multi-functional, station-integrated development

**Candidate 2: 龙华海岸城 (Longhua Coast City)**
- Located in Longhua District
- Total construction area: ~1,086,760㎡ (约108万㎡)
- Urban renewal project on former 第三工业区 land
- Mixed-use: commercial, office, hotel, residential
- Under construction/planned

**Candidate 3: 壹方天地/壹成中心花园 (Hongrongyuan)**
- Commercial area: ~60万㎡
- Not as large as 100万㎡ for total project

The search for "深圳北站商务区 规模 相当于东京涩谷" didn't find a direct comparison. Let me try a different approach and look for the specific context of this question. It might be from a Chinese exam, article, or quiz.

Let me also check if there's a specific project in Longhua that is described as "comparable to Shibuya" in any context. The user's phrasing "The project should be 'comparable' to the Shibuya Station redevelopment in Tokyo" could be a key feature of a specific document.

Let me also look at the 1000万㎡ total for the 梅林关片区, and the other candidates more carefully. But let me also look for a more direct source.

Actually, I think the user is working on a specific question, likely from a Chinese language test or research context, and they need to confirm which project in Longhua District (a) has a development area exceeding 100万㎡, (b) is under construction or in planning, (c) is a major urban redevelopment, (d) is comparable to Shibuya Station redevelopment, and (e) is a well-known "在建或规划大

Now I have a comprehensive picture. Let me look at the 壹成中心 (Hongrongyuan Yicheng Center) more carefully:

**壹成中心花园 (Hongrongyuan Yicheng Center)**:
- Total building area: ~320万㎡ (total for all 10 zones)
- Located in Longhua District, centered around Shenzhen North Station area
- Mixed-use: residential, commercial, office, education
- This is one of the largest urban renewal projects in Shenzhen

So now my candidates are:

1. **深圳北站国际商务区** - Planning area ~970万㎡ to 12.71平方公里, total construction >10 million sqm. This is the overarching district plan.
2. **壹成中心花园 (鸿荣源/Yinful Yuan)** - Total construction ~320万㎡ across all zones. This is a specific mega-project within/near the 北站商务区.
3. **龙华海岸城** - Total construction ~108万㎡.
4. **壹方天地** - Commercial area ~60万㎡.

The user mentions "~320万㎡" for 壹方天地/壹成中心花园 by Hongrongyuan, which matches perfectly with 壹成中心花园's reported ~320万㎡ total construction area.

Now let me reconsider what makes something "comparable to Shibuya Station redevelopment":

Let me now look at the key data I have and make a decision. Let me also check the Shenzhen North Station Business Center area's total building area from a 2017 Sohu article to get a more specific number.

From the 2017 shenzhen news (sznews.com) article: "6.1平方公里土地，建设体量与福田中心区不相上下；规划建设超千万平方米建筑面积" - the 6.1 sq km core area is planned to have over 10 million sqm of building area, with a total investment of over 200 billion yuan.

From the 2020 zhihu article: "规划面积为970万平米，商业建筑面积550万平米" - the planning area is 970万㎡, commercial building area 550万㎡.

Wait, there's a discrepancy. The sznews article says "规划面积12.71平方公里" for the overall 北站国际商务区, while the zhihu article says "规划面积为970万平米" (9.7 million sqm, or about 9.7 km²). The 12.71 square km is the current official name. The 970万㎡ might be the original/earlier plan, or the 12.71 is a different scope. The 12.71 is the "北站国际商务区" (2023), which is a bit different from the original "北站商务中心区" (2017-2020). The 12.71 is a bit larger, as the Longhua go

Let me visit the 2017 article about 北站商务中心区规划 from Sohu and also check one more thing - let me look at whether 深圳北站商务区 or 壹成中心 is specifically compared to Shibuya.

Actually, I think I have enough information now. Let me compile my findings.

Looking at all the evidence:

**深圳北站国际商务区 (Shenzhen North Station International Business District)**:
- Located in Longhua District (龙华区)
- Planning area: ~970万㎡ (originally) / 12.71平方公里 (updated official scope)
- Core area: 6.1平方公里
- Total construction area: 超千万平方米 (over 10 million sqm)
- Commercial/O办公 building area: ~550万㎡
- Focus: TOD station-area development around Shenzhen North Railway Station
- Total investment: over 2000亿元
- Multi-functional: offices, retail, hotels, residential, parks
- Station-centered mega-development (like Shibuya)

**壹成中心花园 (Hongrongyuan Yicheng Center)**:
- Located in Longhua District
- Total construction area: ~320万㎡ (across all 10 zones)
- Mixed-use: residential, commercial, office, education
- Urban renewal proje

Let me try to visit the official Longhua government page about 北站国际商务区 for more details.

Now let me compile everything I've gathered and prepare my final report. Let me also verify one more detail about 龙华海岸城.

Now I have comprehensive information about both major candidates. Let me finalize my analysis:

**深圳北站国际商务区**:
- Planning area: 12.71平方公里 (overall 北站国际商务区 scope), core area 6.1平方公里
- Total construction area: 超千万平方米 (over 10 million sqm)
- Commercial/O办公 building area: ~550万㎡
- Located in Longhua District ✓
- Major urban redevelopment ✓
- Station-centered mega-development ✓ (like Shibuya)
- Total investment: over 2000亿元 ✓
- Multi-functional ✓ (offices, retail, hotels, residential, parks)

**龙华海岸城**:
- Total construction area: ~108.68万平方米 (~109万㎡)
- Located in Longhua District ✓
- Urban renewal project ✓
- Mixed-use ✓ (commercial, office, hotel, residential)
- Approved October 2022 ✓

Both qualify as "在建或规划大型项目" with development areas exceeding 100万㎡.

The key differentiator is the "comparable to Shibuya Station redevelopment" criterion. 

Shibuya Station redevelopment is specifically a **station-area development** - it's built around a major railway station (Shibuya Station) and integra